Culture
Data Management
Data Professionals

The CDO Matters Podcast Episode 105

The Business Already Gets Governance — Data Leaders Just Aren’t Listening with Donna Burbank

X

Episode Overview:

The Business Already Gets Governance — Data Leaders Just Aren’t Listening

Executives at the World Economic Forum in Davos are asking for data governance but the data profession wasn’t in the room to answer. The gap isn’t the business’s understanding. It’s ours.

📌 In this episode:

  • Why Donna Burbank found business leaders, not data teams, driving governance conversations at Davos this year

  • The flip from “data literacy” to “business literacy” and why the old term is judgmental

  • Donna’s “Semantic Pedanticism Feedback Loop” and how jargon fights kill credibility in front of executives

  • Why “assume positive intent” isn’t enough on its own. You have to assume positive intelligence too

💬 The takeaway: “We tend to sit in our own little silo and say, how come the business isn’t hearing us? Because we’re talking to ourselves about others.” — Donna Burbank

About the host + guest: Malcolm Hawker is a former Gartner analyst, Chief Data Officer at Profisee, Editor-in-Chief of CDO Matters on Substack, and host of the CDO Matters Podcast. Guest: Donna Burbank is founder and managing director of Global Data Strategy, a firm focused on data strategy and hands-on implementation.

Episode Links & Resources:

Good morning. Good afternoon. Good evening. Good whatever time it is, wherever you are on planet Earth. I am so thankful that you’ve decided to join us today. We’re gonna have a great conversation.

We’re gonna be talking about governance and governance more specifically in the boardroom and how governance has become the topic in corporate boardrooms. How do I know?

Well, that’s gonna be the expertise of our guest today. I’m I’m thrilled that Donna Burbank is joining us. Donna has been active in the data and analytics space for a while. I’m not gonna say a long time because that would make that would make me old too.

But Dawn is extremely active in in our space. She’s the founder and managing director of global data strategy, which is a obviously focused services firm focused on data strategy. But not just data strategy, actual implementation, getting stuff done too. We’ll probably talk about that a little bit, but Donna and I have been orbiting the data and analytics sun together for for a while. This is the first time we’ve ever done this on a podcast, so thank you, Donna, for joining us today.

Thank you. I’m looking forward to it. Yeah. We seem to meet each other at random places around the world, but we’ve never done this.

So Yeah. I I know. I was I was thinking about that before before I jumped on. I was thinking about our last random encounter, which was on the Elizabeth line in London.

Like, randomly, I don’t even think we were at the same event, or maybe we were.

I don’t even get surprised anymore. I’m at some random airport. Oh, there’s Malcolm.

Yeah. Yeah. Well, that’s so for me, I don’t know if you know Sanjeev Mohan, but but that’s for me, that’s Sanjeev. Like, I could I could right now, I could probably just drop my headset and run to my local airport, and I’d see Sanjeev.

It just it just it just just it just is for whatever reason. But, no, it’s it’s it’s wonder wonderful we could finally do this. We’ve had a lot of conversations over the years about things, and and glad we could kind of formalize it. So, anyway, the genesis of this conversation and and the topic of today’s podcast is how governance is now front of mind for senior leaders.

And I’m not just talking about any senior leaders. I’m talking about the boardroom. I’m talking about the c suite. I’m talking about the people who are investing billions of dollars into venture capital and private equity to actually kind of drive software markets.

And again, how do I know this? Well, Donna had a chance to attend something called the World Economic Forum. So and where she was hearing about governance from these leaders. Donna, why don’t you what is the World Economic Forum for those who may may or may not know, and how did you find yourself at it?

Yeah. No. Great question. So, World Economic Forum, if folks, you know, don’t see it in the news pretty regularly, it’s in Davos every year, which is a lovely little ski town in Switzerland. And it it is the place where it basically, the name says what it is. It is the the forum where all world leaders tend to get together and sets the stage. They always have it in January.

And it really is kind of setting the pulse for what what the what what the world is seeing in terms of the focus is economics, but it’s also, you know, world hunger and, you know, you know, really trying to drive global change. And the topic is different every year. It could be global health. It could be manufacturing growth. Right? And these are presidents and prime ministers, generally CEOs of the major companies.

Major nonprofits are there, you know, Red Cross and things like that. And so I got the opportunity through a partner company of mine called The Digital Economist to go speak on data governance. And and sort of my my goal for myself this year, and and, Malcolm, I know you and I have talked about this a lot, we tend to sit in our own little silo and say, how come the business isn’t hearing us? Right?

Because we’re in we’re talking to ourselves about others. So I sort of say, well, what other forums am I not going to? When I got the opportunity to go to the forum that, you know, is really driving things, I I I took the chance to you know? And I thought I was asked to go speak that I was gonna go because we tend to do this.

I’m a data person. I can pick on us because I’m in the club. Yep. Sort of the hubris or whatever of saying, I’m gonna go teach people about governance, and and this is what we can talk about.

Oh, was I surprised. It was already top of mind. And what was disappointing is that our our people, our data management, our data governance, our master data management weren’t in the room. It was the platform vendors, the database vendors, and the AI vendors, but there was no one in the in the middle from the from the tech side representing.

I I was there. There were a few other speakers speaking about governance. But what was interesting, it was the business speaking about governance. So it would be a topic on ag tech, how we use AI for agricultural growth.

There’s something that you know? And the first item is how are we gonna govern the data. I would be having a coffee. One of the wonderful things, if you get the opportunity to go take it, it’s a lovely, very collaborative environment.

You meet people on the train, and you gotta be careful. It could be the prime minister or something. Right? So the guy next to me on the not talking to me, talking to his colleague was saying, I’m starting a data governance program.

I’m wondering how to set up my stewardship structure. I’m stepping back like, wait. They’re talking about our stuff. And that’s really a flip.

And I I wrote a a a blog because we always talk about that you might wanna catch after that. We can put it in the in the link. But, we always talk about data literacy, and I think it’s it’s the flip. We need to think of business literacy.

We’re not going to these forums and talking to people about, we’re listening because they’re already asking for it. And so I think that was a big moment that you and I were talking about at the last conference of we’re not in the right conversations. So it’s.

Well, that’s okay. So that’s really striking. There’s a lot of things to unpack there.

One of the things that we could unpack is if if what you say is true, and I have no doubt why would I disbelieve you, because you wanna tell your story, and I would wanna tell the story. So if that’s true, then then why is the pervasive mindset? And I can say that it is because you and I are going to the data events. Right?

We’re we’re talking to the people who put the shovels in the ground. Okay? And and and we’re at these events. We’re at the presentations.

The predominant mindset of people at these events is nobody cares.

Right? So and and and and that’s obviously not it’s it’s it’s not everybody thinking that way. But but the predominant mindset I wrote an entire book on this. The prod which I still need to ship you, by the way.

The predominant mindset around this is the business doesn’t get it. The business doesn’t see the value of governance. Nobody’s committing the resources for stewardship. Nobody’s supporting my MDM effort.

And what you’re saying is that, oh, no. There’s interest. They they want to figure this out, and they they feel like they need to figure that this out. Is it is that is that kinda, like, one one of your bigger takeaways?

I think so. I mean, there’s several reasons for it. Maybe there’s two big the one just that we can immediately we as the data community immediately start to take action on. And as you mentioned, they run a consultancy, and it’s the one thing I tell my team all the time is just listen first, speak in the business language, and not talk at at each other.

And we can all inherently understand that. Right? Wouldn’t you want these great group of friends who you have a doctor friend that someone can tell you what this medical speak means in really clear terms and not talk down to you or a lawyer friend that can explain things or someone about your car that can tell you what’s wrong with it without feeling like you’re stupid. Right?

And I’ve had I’m honored enough to be in the boardrooms across a lot of the large companies helping folks with these types of things. And I’ve had people be very blunt with me. I don’t wanna talk to IT. They talk down to me like I’m stupid.

And and I think we come in and I did myself going to Davos saying, I’m going to introduce people to the idea of governance. And it’s not that me teaching me, teaching them. It’s how do I listen to what and and because that ag tech, I just I didn’t realize ag tech was such a big thing. It was fascinating to me.

I have to learn about ag tech before I can be in the room with them about how they govern the central data for watering sprinklers. Right? But we we we come talking at them. I think that’s half of it, and perhaps the other half is a lot of well, I I’ll stop there.

I think that’s one of the the big drivers of of we go into these rooms teaching people we’re not listening first, and maybe we have to take it down to notch with our our conversation and speaking real English. You know?

Well, the simple fact that we call it data literacy Yes. Is is is in and of itself a judgmental term.

Right? It it’s it’s it’s judgmental. What what it says is is that you don’t get it.

And what you’re what you’re telling me is, no. They do get it. And that we’ve got a major communication issue here, but we’ve also got a mindset issue here. Right? So it may be what what you’re suggesting, it may be, is that at some of these companies, the senior executives are getting it, and maybe they’re just speaking a different language. Maybe they’re speaking the language of the business. Maybe they’re encoding their descriptions of their needs or their requirements.

And what they’re saying is is I need governance. I need governance. I need governance. And what we’re hearing is maybe something else. Right? Or or maybe we’re not even understanding it because it’s not being spoken in the language of data.

And what you’re suggesting is we need to a good solution here is to speak the language of business and that maybe we can connect the dots if we actually start speaking the language of of the business. I I I couldn’t I couldn’t agree more. I’ve got you I don’t I don’t wanna hurt my book, but I’ve got I’ve got multiple chapters on my book about why this is important, how the idea of literacy is judgmental, but more importantly, how that mindset would would would put you in a position of talking at and down to somebody instead of speaking with somebody. So in these conversations, you you you you kind of, like, got the Oh my god. They wanna talk about governance.

When you went into detail in some of these conversations, what did what did it look like? What what did you what did you hear? Right? Is it is it we need to do this for AI? I need to do this for compliance. I need to do this for my regulators in the EU. What what were what were what’s the next layer of the the cake that you were hearing about?

You know, that’s interesting. I think it’s and I will say the cake didn’t go as deep to your point. Folks know that and I hear this all the time from what I do talk to my clients. I know I need it.

What is it? Could somebody explain it to me in simple terms? Right? And I was not there last year at the World Economic Forum, and no surprise, you don’t have to be at the World Economic Forum to know that there’s a lot of AI hype.

And I think last year, it was all AI, all, you know, unicorns and roses. And this year felt a little more, okay. Now I actually I have to do this, or they’re seeing the it it was it was more that I I get it. How do we manage this data?

In fact, one of the speakers I really like this quote. Was gonna steal. He’s like, all AI is is math on top of data, and so you gotta get the data right. But there aren’t people you know, I I I mentioned before that the the platform vendors, the database vendors, or the the data platform vendors, and the AI vendors there, but their message is really simple.

You know, we have a platform to put your data on. We can make your data sync. We inherently sometimes when we have our covers and I do it myself. Well, to start governance, there’s an aspect that’s data quality, but, really, that’s not the same as metadata quality.

And then we have master data, which is not the same as metadata, and they’re like, out of here. Getting a coffee. Right? And so how do we it is nuanced, but maybe we have to simplify our I I can’t picture even myself.

We don’t have the billboard. When you walk down the promenade on on Davos, it’s interesting. They close all the stores. I didn’t know this.

So if you own a a friend of mine lives, is a Swiss person that lives in the town next door, he was telling me this. If you own, like, say, a shoe store in in the Davos Promenade, you can only lease for eleven months because they take your whole store and they fill it with snowflake or Anthropic or something, and they they literally it becomes, you know, the Anthropic store now. It’s not, your shoe store. Right?

So you walk down the promenade, and they all have a really nice pithy sign. AI to lose the business. I can’t picture what I just said on the side. Well, it’s nuanced.

We have metadata, which is not the same as master data, which needs lineage, is not the same as the semantic layer.

We have to be better at our messaging and keeping it simple and driving it to the business because none of our people, the master data, the metadata, the any of that were on the it was again, they had the quick simple message, but the business was asking for it. They’re like, I know this more than that. I tried it. Like, last year, I bought into the AI hype.

Now I’m finding and it wasn’t so much to answer your question. There was some regulation. People know they but it was more the inherent need. I’m driving my business on this.

Data AI is just math on top of data. How do I get the data right? Who can help me with that? Right? So I thought that was interesting.

We we we love to be pedantic.

Right? We just we just so I I came up with this this thing, and and and I have to give credit where credit is due because because the person who kind of crystallized my mind around this is a is a gentleman named Doug Laney, also well known in our space, wrote a wonderful book called Infonomics. If you haven’t read it, it actually is to me is the seminal work on on on how to quantify the business value of data. But thanks to Doug’s input, I came up with this this thing called the semantic pedanticism feedback loop.

And and how we we continue to feed on ourselves and we go into these downward spirals around all of these pedantic concepts that the business just doesn’t care about. I’ll give I’ll give you an example. Every time I post something on LinkedIn about unstructured data, all of not all. Not all. A material number of the comments are there’s no such thing as unstructured data. And I’m like, oh my gosh.

Could you not could you not have that conversation in front of the business? Right?

Well well well well, right. But that’s but that’s what we do. Exactly. Yes. Right? And if the business expresses something in a way that that that is like our kryptonite that we can’t that we can’t ignore, right, that we start to go down these pedantic downwards death spirals, then they’re gonna walk out of the conversation, and they they’re gonna think that we don’t get it.

So, you know, you’re in the business. What what from a skills perspective, obviously, what you said, first thing, business literacy. Right? Like, understand how the business works.

Does that mean that you need to be a PhD in ag tech? No. Probably not. But you do need to understand how the business works.

You need to understand how they speak. What if you’re hiring a consultant to go into this space, what are you looking for from a skills perspective? How do how do we need to train better or hire better in order to have these conversations?

No. Great question. Well, the first, even before training, is just personality. Will you listen first?

Right? Are you listening? Because I it’s funny. I do I’m getting nerdy already. But I one of my favorite success stories is I will answer your question, but I’m I’m doing the data person thing and going in a longer thing.

I I did a data modeling project at a water company. I knew nothing about water systems, and I was there for two weeks, did an enterprise model, asked the questions in the interview, did the readout of the data model. And someone came out later to me and said, where have you been? You clearly have been at this company for about twenty years and I’ve heard nobody explain how our business works better than you.

Like, two weeks. All I did was ask the questions the data model does. How do your pipes how do you you know, how do you regulate the water? How do you price the water?

I have it’s been a few years, so I can’t say it as well now. But and and that was the listening. So I think one is a personality. Listen first.

Ask the right questions, not the nerdy question because you can get, does a pipe have more than one fitting? Is that you know, what’s the cardinality of that? You can say it in a really nerdy way, or you can do it from a business context because that’s where the business will I my favorite comment around a data modeling workshop is me the pen. You start to say things like, can a customer have more than one account?

That sounds really nerdy, but then they’re like, right. They could have a brokerage account, a four zero one k account, and a oh, right. How do we manage that? And as soon as you get them in the conversation, that’s a data con they may not see it.

But as soon as they see it, they’re they’re gonna be bought into governance. And I hardly ever call it governance first. Right? But to answer your direct question, because I am probably too much of a data person and go in circles, I mean, a power combination is tech and an MBA.

A lot of my consultants have that. A lot of consultants don’t come from data at all. One of my best consultants was an accountant. It’s that same kind of thinking, and she customers love her.

I’m biased. My first degree was liberal arts, and I know at the time they told me that’s gonna help you. It’s gonna help you. And right out of college, it didn’t make as much.

It didn’t help me then. But that is more of a mindset, that that holistic thinking. And even if you weren’t trained with an MBA or trained with a liberal arts or English major or whatever, just that mindset of, am I listening first and and and listen with the business language? Because that is data.

And and I know I get proud when I make the make see, I just said it myself. When I engage with the business and their light bulb goes off, that that’s data, what they’re talking about, how they manage their accounts and their products and all that, then you’ve got them in. Same thing with my consultants sometimes.

That same thing, a cardinality rule in the data model. Can a customer have more than one account? That’s really boring. It’s a line on a diagram. Once you really understand why that’s really important to the business, they might have different divisions, then accounts aren’t talking to each other, and and it’s hard to roll up the revenue across four zero one k’s and mutual funds. Right?

Then they get it too, and then their whole conversations are different. So, you know, listen first, and we put it actually in our methodology. Before you know the client, you read their annual report. Look.

My most of my consult they they joke with me. I know, Don. I read the annual report. I’ve read the annual report of a company that nobody else did, and then even the CEO was saying we wanna be data driven, and the data team hadn’t read that.

Like, did you know that your CEO wants to be data driven and listen to what they’re asking for? It’s just so that part of it’s even a methodology before you go to the client. Read their website. Read their annual report.

Look in the news with the you know? And and so we can all get that mindset of listening first, learning first, and then talking about the data and challenge yourself to say, how was data in that conversation?

Well,

what you just said reminded me of many instances when I was leading both data teams and product teams.

So I’m a bit of a weirdo. I’ve been a chief product officer in the past, and and now I’m a chief data officer.

And across both of those worlds, I’ve had people who work for me try to tell me the business doesn’t know what they want.

And and every time I hear that, that’s like that’s like on the soccer field when the referee pulls out the yellow card. Right? Wait a minute. Hold on a second. The you’re trying to tell me the business doesn’t know what they want.

I’m calling BS because they know exactly what they want. They just may not be articulating it the way that you need to hear it, or you lack the curiosity to probe deeper to to to keep going. Right? It’s like interrogating a witness, I would Right? Like, if you’re not getting the answers, you need to ask a question a different way. Right? Right.

Getting back to

the problem.

Being interrogated.

That’s the

magic too.

Because we can do that.

Probably the wrong

and they get freaked out.

Pro probably the wrong metaphor.

And interrogation, probably the wrong metaphor, but hopefully, you get my point. Right? Which is, you know, to keep asking the same question over and over and in different ways until until you get to the heart of the issue. But getting back to the qualities. Right? You you there’s a few that jump out.

One, curiosity. Right? We need to be more curious. Right? Two is problem solvers. Right? Like, analysts, like like, people who are kind of native like like, natively, like, enraptured by trying to solve complex problems where the problem is understanding what is being articulated to you.

Not necessarily the technical problem, but the business problem that is being articulated to you. Kinda like you you mentioned MBAs. Right? Like, sounds a lot like a a case study for an MBA.

Right? Like, here’s all the symptoms. Here’s all the things. Now tell me what you think is inherently going wrong with this business or maybe going right with this business.

So problem solver, curiosity, you said listen before speaking.

Like, those are all all those things, I think, if we do those things, I I I have a hard time seeing how AI takes our job, at least that job.

Do you agree?

Oh, no. We should be all set with AI because AI’s map on top of data. Right? So that and people are looking for folks like us.

And and for some folks, like, yeah. Maybe I have a I have a you know, I got a computer science degree. I didn’t go into the softer skills because I like analytics. You can still, like, point that analytical mind to a different just like you would debug your code or do the data lineage for data.

If you could do that mental switch, and I’ve seen techie people really thrive with that mindset, do that you’re already good at problem solving, but point that to the business. It’s the same thing or the five whys. Oh, because, you know, your your company’s master data, that’s a classic one that you can fix it with match merge rules. It’s often a business process change.

So why did the data get that? Who is using that data? And the more you can just it can still be fun in a different way and sometimes getting that light bulb from the tech folks saying, it’s the same skills you’re using just or a person. Why are they thinking that way?

Not like again, I’m not like you make it feel like you’re analyzing them, but but break that down. What are their motivations? And and you can do it in a very logical way. Why are they nervous about talking to me?

Why would they maybe not wanna do data? Right? And that can help. So it’s the same skills we have, just maybe applied to a different topic.

Well well right. And so the to me, this is the lesson to any kind of more technically leaning person in the data world, whether that’s an engine software or data engineer, data modeler, data data hyphen, anything where you’re leaning a little more technical, where you need to be learning is leaning is more on the business side and try to understand, okay. What are the ramifications for a business perspective? How is the business actually using the data? How is this driving downstream value?

Because if we automate, where we’re gonna automate is on the technical side, I would argue, where we won’t necessarily

Right.

Yeah. There’s rules. You the data rules.

Yeah. Just imagine just imagine, like, we just imagine a world where we have fully automated the the the business analysis. I don’t see that happening in the short term.

Right? There is no single shot one query to rule them all to help to help where a bot can tell me how my business runs.

People are going to are going to have the deep knowledge and deep information and and the ability to infer and derive in a way that AI will never never do, at least in the short term, I think.

So so that’s interesting about career direction. But getting back to governance.

Get getting getting back

to governance.

One more thing what you just said.

Don’t wait.

I’ve had the same light bulb this well, AI jobs aren’t going away because we’re that semantics, whatever that needs. If you can automate part of it, it can scan documents and give you ideas, but that inherently is a people thing. And ironically, it’s the more AI automates, the more people in those and that’s what back to the Davos, it was a really cure and everyone said it’s not the sessions you go to. It’s those serendipitous people meeting.

And and when you said, did I believe what you said? I thought it was hype too. I said, yeah. You guys make it sound like Disneyland for nerds, like all these smart people just getting together.

But it it was that serendipity I’ll tell one story. Sorry. I I went to I did I’m not embarrassed to say I did not know a whole lot about quantum computing, which was another big topic. Right?

So I went to this session where there was this PhD who actually got the Nobel Prize in quantum computing to explain it. That person was very clear, summarized what they knew. Right? It was a very business centric presentation, so he does that very well.

But I’d said that in the line. I don’t know anything about quantum computing. And this lady said, would you like me to explain? And and proceeded to give, like, a fifteen minute summary of how it was manual.

Like, again, that business centric for people who don’t know it. And she got, like I don’t know if anyone’s old enough to remember that when EF Hutton talks, people listen.

But that people just swarmed around her. I found out later she’s one of the CEOs of one of these microchip you know, the the quantum computing chip companies just happened to be next to me. Right? So my point is that is a hyperscale getting really smart people.

I don’t know why they invite me, but really smart people together. And so AI just just funnels that. You don’t spend your time doing data lineage and reading. You know, you can summarize the documents.

So it doesn’t make people less important. It makes them more important. And those allows those serendipitous human to human connections. That’s where the magic happens, and I think we forget that.

And Davos, to me, like, light bulb. Right? That know, like, AI couldn’t have done that. Yeah.

I could have read the same thing she said, but it was the person and the engagement. And so that’s what we need to think with with the the data stuff and the data skills. People do wanna hear what we have to say. You have a seat at the table in the boardroom.

People are dying to hear what you have to say. That lady could have made her topic really boring. Quantum computing can be really nerdy.

We all were fascinated, right, because she said it in a really clear way. She didn’t talk down to us. She just explained it, and it was that human to human. If I had read it, I wouldn’t have gotten it as much as hearing her and her passion for the topic and all that.

So our nerdy passion, and I I tend to overdo it myself, is is our superpower. So AI doesn’t make our job go away. It elevates it, and it’s that but but you can’t hide at your laptop. You have to share it in a in a way.

You know?

So

So a couple a couple more critical skills there.

One, for lack of a better word, storytelling. Right? How do you how do you tell the story in a way in an using a narrative that is meaningful for your for your audience? Because I guarantee you, she was able to explain quantum without going deep on, you know, superposition and, you know, Schrodinger’s cat. Right?

I I can guarantee you she she would use very powerful language that was meaningful for her audience. So storytelling is one.

Humility sounds like another one.

Excellent. Yeah.

Humility sounds like another one. Like like because what you’re saying is is that these are some of the smartest people on the planet and the most influential people on the planet, yet there was a thirst for knowledge and there was a thirst for learning. That to me suggests humility.

And the ability to say, I don’t know certain things. You know, when I listen to the the Nobel Prize winner, he’s like, I don’t know a lot about this, but I’m really good at this, and we need to do that. And it’s hard, and it took me a long time in my career because I had to be at a place where I could say, do know a lot of things. So when I go to the ag tech CEO, I could say, I you know, humility, and that goes a long way. I don’t know this about your business, but I do know this from other industries, and I think it could apply.

It just it’s a much it’s a conversation than a non election.

Yeah. You know what I mean? It makes me makes me think of those old SNL skits of the unfrozen caveman lawyer. I don’t know if you ever watched Saturday Night Live back in the day. I don’t know anything about your moving flying machines, but I know that if you spill a hot cup of coffee on somebody left, they’re should get twenty billion dollars.

Anyway, I lost my track of thought because I’ve been down to SNL rabbit

hole.

Segue.

Yeah. Well, no. We we were we were talking about covers. I was listening to you speak, and basically what we were saying is and and this is gonna sound a little pithy, but that the AI advantage, as it were, for for us is to focus on our interpersonal skills and how to to relate to other people, how to understand other people, how to communicate with other people. Yet at the same time, so often when we get in these discussions about governance, what you hear is is that it’s a people problem.

Not a people opportunity, but a people problem.

Right? Well, it’s always people. Right? And I’ve heard this is, a zillion times. Right? Like, well, why why aren’t they following the rules?

Why aren’t they showing up to the committee meetings? Why aren’t they why are they doing dumb stuff in Salesforce? Oh, people problem. People problem.

Well, maybe it’s more of a people opportunity than than than a people problem. And that and that’s exactly what we we’ve been saying, right, which is listen more. Be be humble. Assume you don’t know.

Learn the business. Learn the process.

Well,

because you just summed it up.

They don’t come to the meeting and follow the rules. Gee. That sounds fun. I’m gonna go to a meeting, and I’ve I’ve been with a lot of these where some data person lectures me about a policy. I wouldn’t go back either. And I’ve had some success this year flipping the script because even that people are doing the wrong thing in Salesforce, what I find and I hardly ever use absolutes, like always or never, but I’ve never Right.

Right.

In my

thirty years of doing this, I did use a number, that that someone came to work and said, I wanna make the data bad.

People are trying to do the best thing amongst constraints. So I’ve seen crazy things. I’m gonna get nerdy, in a Salesforce or one of the big SAP, you know, that they have duplicate I’m getting into your world. Sorry about like, duplicate vendors, vendor a with a shipping address, vendor b with a mailing address.

No. We come in and they made they’re dumb. They did duplicates. Well, because the system wouldn’t let them create multiple addresses.

It’s a data problem, but we didn’t let and once I got it took me a few because that one happens a lot. Like, why were you doing that? And they’ll probably again show you a whole SOP and what they were trying to do or weird things you see in the data. Like, yeah.

We prefaced it with x six nine because that meant something because the systems weren’t working for them. And if you listen to them, they probably were really, really smart, but they’re not using our language. And they yes. They did this convoluted thing and going to say, great.

How can we help you take all that thing and make the systems work for you?

Oh my gosh. They’ll come to the meetings because you’re solutioning with them and listening because they’re not dumb people. In fact, a lot of the solutions they did to work around systems that didn’t work for themselves making the data bad were brilliant. We just didn’t listen to them.

So that’s one thing I’ve done that’s very impactful. Then they’re then they understand why they’re a data steward or a data owner because, oh, right. That’s my data I’m working with every day. And then some fun things.

We just started one with some we just started with, like, a a gripe session. What drives you crazy about data? And what’s interesting?

Well, well, these were people, like, regular people, and they’re like, you know and and they were using our language but with different words. There’s no drop down for state codes. You know, we only operate in Michigan, and and there so but I have to go through. So I just put Alabama every time because it’s at the beginning.

And if you could just make my life easier, like, us, that’s reference data. So they just gave me the solution right there with different words. Had I not listened and started and I’ve seen this, I go into the data governance meeting and give them a twelve slide thing of the and what ref how reference data is like, to your point, it’s not master data. Reference data is different, which is shoot.

I would have lost that person. But letting them talk and then we translate and say, that problem you have, we can solve. We even use the term reference data.

Right? And there was a whole bunch of those people that were already explaining the things they were doing that they wanted help with. And we very and now I always do that with my data governance meet. It’s kinda fun.

Everybody laughed, and they’re like, oh my gosh. That drives me crazy too. And we very quickly came to the top ten things we needed to fix in the business and, like, eight eight of the more mastered data things that were easily fixed. So that was a great example of collaborate.

I often call governance just collaboration because adults that most people are adults, and they wanna out trying to do something wrong or even like, oh, I didn’t know you needed that data downstream. Oh, I just thought it was a stupid field. Now I know why you need the weights and measures of a product because when you do tariffs, you need it. I didn’t know that.

Sorry. Now you told me. You know, even amongst themselves, people will solve their problems. You know?

Two two things jump out to me based on what you just said. And, again, getting back to, you know, qualities of a successful data governance lead or manager.

One, assume positive intent.

For for heaven’s sakes. Let’s assume positive intent. This is a relationship.

You are married to the business. K? You gotta make this work. They’re not going away. You’re committed. You’ve you’ve you’ve got the ring.

You gotta assume positive intent. Nobody’s out there trying to make your job harder. They’re just trying to do their job. If you could just assume positive intent, that’s half the battle.

The other thing that I heard you say, and this this is something I know I’m I’m not gonna move this. I’m not gonna change this. Just little old me in my voice. But what what you described is that let’s talk about the systems problem.

K? And I see it I see it every day. I see it I see it literally every day.

The systems are broken for whatever reason. Right? The list of the list of potential reasons is or or even broken is a judgmental term. The the systems are incompatible with how we need data to be structured or or governed for multiple reasons.

The biggest one being is we are functionally specialized. Thank you, Deming. Thank thank thank you, Henry Ford. Thank you, whoever.

Right? In that marketing is specialized function from finance, and they use different tools. And those tools structure, manage, govern data slightly differently because those functions operate differently. If we acknowledge that and if we acknowledge that the data is going to be different between them, why do we then call it a data quality problem?

Yes.

And we do.

Right? Like, I I I can I can every time I see a survey talking about how data quality sucks and how data quality is the biggest barrier to insert something here, digital transformation? Right? ERP consolidation, AI aspirations, data qualities. I I immediately call BS on that because most of the time, not all the time, sometimes the data’s just flat wrong, but a lot of the times, it’s because of how we define data quality.

Meaning it’s inconsistent by source. Oh, does that mean it’s bad? It’s not bad to the source. It’s not bad to those processes.

The processes are running. We’re we’re we’re executing contracts. We’re we’re we’re selling product. We’re we’re receiving inventory.

But to us, it’s bad because we’re trying to do cross functional analytics, and we can’t make sense of supplier one versus supplier two, we call that a data quality issue.

Like, that, Donna, traces exactly right back to this idea of data versus business literacy.

Right. If we if we knew the data was that way by design, right, and that it’s inconvenient to us, it it makes it harder to run cross functional analytics or to do MDM or to do whatever, but maybe we’d start looking at our customers a little bit differently.

Yeah. What what I mean, like I use the word customer, like, purposefully.

Yeah. We don’t use that word either.

Right. Right. Yeah. No. I I think and that’s you know, it’s it’s funny because when I I was almost going to do what we just said not to do when you said something like a digital transformation.

I was gonna be, well, it could be a data model issue, but part of it’s a semantic like, I was just gonna go put because it is nuanced. Like, that data quality problem, it could be how you structure the data. It could actually be the values, but the values could be based on a process. And I was just gonna do that same thing.

But I I a client a customer of mine actually said the most powerful words in the in the human language are for example.

Right? And the more because we can say that you need a single hierarchy of of regions, and and they’re all different. We can’t you know? Like, well, there is a finance hierarchy.

You roll up that by sales region, which is different than a shipping who does it by geography. Right? So as soon as you give examples that, yes, there’s two different ways of looking how we’re gonna roll up our products, then there’s a marketing view that you might put on the website because Chicago City is different than Chicago suburbs. They buy differently.

Then that makes perfect sense, and you’re not trying to shoehorn something in. So, yeah, the the examples help. We we have an issue with it with with with rolling up the data in these ways people need. That’s a classic one, and people a a data person comes in, and I’ve done it.

We can’t have this. There’s three. And once you explain it in English, of course, there’s three. Because how you how you in you know, how how you commission your salespeople and how you show it on the website and how you roll up for finance should be three different things.

Right? Well, yeah. Well, then that’s that’s the answer. And and I I do it myself when I’m trying to solve why.

What why? What’s the business reason we’re doing this? Right? And then if in there, you have three different sales reasons spelled wrong, yeah, that’s a data quality thing.

Fix that. But you have to get to the source of the why. You know? For example, it was a long way, I think.

Well, we use we use such deterministic language to describe our challenges, like the data quality is bad. What does that even mean? Right.

Right?

But we do it all the Or

even worse, we’ll explain it and be like, you know, there’s seven dimensions of data quality.

It’s consistency, conformity, and then someone will say, no. There’s not seven dimensions. There’s ten dimensions because and then the business is like, out of here, people. Like Right.

You are right, and we could say and but if we said you’re having trouble rolling up your product sales because you know that your your product in Europe is is significantly has a different SKU, so we don’t know it’s the same product with a different name. You can’t see your total sales. That makes a whole lot more sense to them, and I don’t care if that’s conformity or consistency or whatever dimension that Those help us to but don’t say that out loud to people, and please don’t argue in front of the business about that nerdy stuff. And I see it all the time.

Right? When we do data quality dashboards, I’ve seen so many that are grouped by that. Your cons your your conformity of your product data is seventy three percent. What the heck does that mean?

Yeah. So I always do it with these are the products that can’t be shipped, or these are the invoices without addresses. And we did that for a digital transformation. We were the most popular kids.

I know that’s part of but for that little thing, thank you. Because my job for this digital transformation is to clean up invoices. And when you guys came to us and talked about data quality, I didn’t know why you were coming to me, but you made my job easier. And for us, it was address consistency, all that stuff.

But she had a task, which was invoices that were wrong that had to be cleaned up, which was data quality. But we put it in her language and gave her actually helped her. Right?

Yeah.

Gone nerdy, but we wouldn’t have gotten the buy in. Right?

So

Well, so you did you just touched on something, which is really kind of not the topic of today, but still critical, which is being able to tie your data quality, data governance initiatives to actual dollars in the bank, to actual meaningful business KPIs, in your in your case, accuracy of invoices or invoices even paid for that matter.

Because, right, if you send an invoice off into the oblivion, nobody even receives it. It’s probably not gonna get paid. So that’s absolutely But kind of circling back to the to the the governance conversations, I’m I’m left wondering here, like, how do we put a bow around all of this? And and may maybe I’m looking for too much of a silver bullet here.

There’s a few things that we’ve been saying that that seem to make some sense to me. Right? Change your mindset.

Right? Stop thinking in a deterministic way. Oh, and by the way, that’s to me, the best thing about all this conversation around context.

Right, all this conversation around context, I I think, okay. So much hype. Oh my gosh. So much hype and a lot of nuance.

And and the context conversation is teetering on sausage making. Right? So I would be very careful with going into a boardroom talking about we need to invest in context. Right?

It’s it’s teetering on sausage making. But to your point, actually, if I think if you said to a business person, hey. Marketing behaves differently than finance, they would be like, yeah. Yeah.

Yeah. We knew that. Next.

Right?

But the the thing that I like about context is is that I think it’s helping us break out of these deterministic mindsets.

Right? And it’s helping us understand that governance to one or rule to one may may not be a rule to another.

Well and you just summed it up. We’ll go to the business with that moment, and they’re gonna be like, yeah? Like, I know a story because I was trying to when when my previous lay was selling data catalogs or metadata repositories back then, and we were trying to implement that explain to the finance department. It’s this awesome thing. We’re using all the words and, you know, impressing ourselves that we were explaining it in a simple way. When you have a figure on the report, we can tell you how it was calculated and where it was sourced and what the you know, is the data clean? And she looked at us kind of in horror and said, you mean you’re not doing that already?

She was like, we can’t get away with that in finance. Well, how, you know, how do you calculate total revenue? Oh, I don’t know. You know?

She’s like, the because finance finance is a lot like what we do. Right? And I often use that in my presentation. You know, if you went and were trying to get your paycheck and and someone’s like, well, we just switched from, you know, accrual accounting to cash based accounting.

I’m like, I don’t care. Where’s my paycheck? Right? And and yet they are very complicated, and there’s a lot of accounting rules.

We don’t hear it. We just see the balance sheet at the end of the year and all that. And so I think we can learn from them because I think they’re expecting we it’s to us, that’s new. Oh my gosh.

We need the business meaning of data, and the business is like, hello? We’ve been trying to tell you this, and you could have a new funny word like semantics, but could you just make it mean something to me? You know, I and I and AI just puts a spotlight on that. But, you know Well And then that’s not new.

It’s new to us.

Well, if you if you if you’re a data leader and you march into a board meeting and you say, I need two million dollars for context, I think you I think you run the risk of that board saying, hey. What do you mean? Of course, our business units operate differently. They’ve always operated differently. Now you you’re telling me that you need two million dollars from me to solve for the fact that our business is optimized around functional specialization. So so, again, that could be that could be risky there.

But get but getting back to the kind of the putting the bow around everything. I I went down a little bit of a context rabbit hole because it’s okay. And the Nuance thing. Because you know what?

Equally. You know what? You’re right. There is nuance. Right? But that’s our job. Our our job is is is to is to manage that and deal with that and come up with solutions to all of that instead of making that our, you know, our our banner.

Right? Instead of making that our, you know, or our burden maybe even. Right? Like, well, you don’t understand how hard it is. Right. You don’t get it. Right?

You don’t know

you don’t know how hard.

They want easy. Right? We don’t impress anybody by showing them how complicated it is. That’s what we do.

Alright. Well, this it’s been a great conversation.

I I think we need to think differently. I think we most certainly need to behave differently. I think it starts with a little bit of that listen first, and maybe a customer mindset, like like a service mindset. I’m here to serve you, not not like take your Jira ticket service, but like like, I’m here to serve you. I think those things would go an awfully long way.

I am encouraged by your stories of Davos.

What if if there’s one one or two things that you would recommend to your clients if it you know, if this is the elevator pitch version now. Obviously, you you get days and weeks to work with your clients. But if you’ve got the elevator pitch to a CDO based off of your experience at Davos, just to kind of tie off on all the things that we said and maybe repeat yourself. That’s okay. What what are one of the two things that you would say in that elevator in order to make some progress around around governance?

Well, as it relates specifically to Davos, but I think it it is across the board, people do wanna hear what you have to say. They do understand what you’re saying, and so don’t use that. We hear and you and I have talked about this, you know, at our own data conference. Oh, no one cares. No one here. And and don’t don’t start with that assumption that you have to move the rock uphill before you even talk to assume and assume both positive intent but intelligence because, you know, if I were to explain what I do to that woman who’s a quantum physics expert, she’s smart.

She’s not like I have to explain to her like she’s a child. I just have to simplify my message because everybody’s job is complicated. You don’t you know, I order a hamburger. They don’t say, well, first, I have to go turn on the stove, and then I have to you just get the hamburger.

Right? And we tend to do that. So I think be positive. I think that’s another big thing we tend to do is be naysayer.

Business is inherently positive.

Yeah.

They’re

they’re they’re we’re gonna do and I’ve done it.

We’re gonna do AI. We’re like, well, wait a minute. Did you think about the dimensions of quality? We’re not gonna invite you to the room.

So can we get excited? Yes. We can do AI. Yes. We can do this. And this is the cool stuff we can do to help you and then tell the story of how it’s gonna help them because, you know, you have a problem right now.

You just said it that finance and and marketing can’t you can’t you can’t roll up the figures and talk together. We can help to that. So think called context. Show you that.

But, yep, I get it. I get it. I hear you. You’re smart. I understand your business.

We can solve it in a simple way, and we’re positive. I think those things right there can go such a long way because we tend to do the opposite. Can’t do it. Let me take you twenty minutes to explain why and use words you don’t understand, and we wonder why they don’t invite us back in the room.

Right? So, anyway, that’s my my advice because in Davos, with those serendipitous things, you had ten minutes, five minutes on a train to talk to someone you didn’t have twenty minutes to bore them with. You know? Or they they were smart and they cut right through it.

Oh, yeah. Metadata, I’ve heard of that. How are you gonna solve it? Like, oh, you actually do know what I’m talking about.

Right?

So don’t then assume positive intent. Be positive, and then assume positive intelligence because most business people wouldn’t be where they were if they weren’t smart.

They would.

Be smart in a different thing. Right?

So

Yep.

Yep.

Well, that’s, that’s that’s encouraging. It’s good advice, and it’s very encouraging.

With that, Donna, thank you so much for taking time out of your busy day, and time away from your clients to speak with us and share your wisdom with our community. If I wanted to learn more about global data strategy and the wonderful insights that you can drive to businesses, how would I go about doing that?

Well, thanks for asking. Yeah. Just global data strategy dot com, all one word, singular, and we’re active on LinkedIn as well. So don’t don’t hesitate. Link it to me. I’m friendly. Love to talk about this stuff.

So

Awesome.

And by the way, chances are pretty good that if you go to any of the DGIQ Enterprise Data World conferences, you may see Donna. You’ll probably see me. And if you don’t see Donna, you just see me. I can get you Donna’s contact information.

But, Donna’s got a great team. She’s been around the block and obviously, knows a lot about subjects. So with that, I will bid you a fond farewell. Donna, thank you again.

Until the next airport encounter somewhere.

Exactly right. If you have if you have stayed till the end of this podcast, I would be tickled if you took the time to subscribe, to the like, to do all the things on the socials, to give us the feedback that we need so that we understand that we’re in a positive direction and we’re providing you content that you find valuable. This isn’t just for CDOs. It’s for anybody who wants to be a CDO. So if you’re in the data and analytics profession, want to learn, want to grow, want to be part of their growing community of data professionals, check us out on LinkedIn, me, Malcolm Hawker.

Check out the podcast. You name it. We’re here to help. Alright. With that, I will leave you.

I hope to see you on another episode of the CTO Matters podcast sometime soon. Thanks all. Bye for now.

Thanks, everyone.

ABOUT THE SHOW

How can today’s Chief Data Officers help their organizations become more data-driven? Join former Gartner analyst Malcolm Hawker as he interviews thought leaders on all things data management – ranging from data fabrics to blockchain and more — and learns why they matter to today’s CDOs. If you want to dig deep into the CDO Matters that are top-of-mind for today’s modern data leaders, this show is for you.
Malcom Hawker - Gartner analyst and co-author of the most recent MQ.

Malcolm Hawker

Malcolm Hawker is an experienced thought leader in data management and governance and has consulted on thousands of software implementations in his years as a Gartner analyst, architect at Dun & Bradstreet and more. Now as an evangelist for helping companies become truly data-driven, he’s here to help CDOs understand how data can be a competitive advantage.
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

You've Read the Playbook. Now Live It.

Malcolm Hawker is bringing the mindset shift from The Data Hero Playbook to the main stage — live. At this year’s Data Hero Summit, he’s joining other data leaders onstage to connect the dots across the whole day: where you stand right now, and what it takes to lead as the world reshapes around AI. If his book changed how you think about your role, this is where you see it in action.
At this year’s Data Hero Summit, Malcolm joins other data leaders onstage to connect the dots across the whole day: where you stand right now, and what it takes to lead as the world reshapes around AI.

LET'S DO THIS!

Complete the form below to request your spot at Profisee’s happy hour and dinner at Il Mulino in the Swan Hotel on Tuesday, March 21 at 6:30pm.

REGISTER BELOW

MDM vs. MDS graphic

Data Hero Summit returns October 8 – learn how heroes like you are tackling the biggest data challenges